Trip Bacon — The secret ingredient to the perfect getaway logo
Trip Bacon

Big Ship, Tiny Funnel: Why Queen Mary 2 HAD to have a short Funnel?

Chris Frame the Maritime Historian
Chris Frame the Maritime Historian
🥈Expert
👁️ 5K views📅 2 years ago⏱️ 5:56
What This Creator Said
Creator RecommendsTips & Advice🥈Expert Creator
TransatlanticVeteran Cruiser

Source: Our analysis of the creator's lived experience, based on what they said in this video.

Creator's Key Takeaways

I recall thinking how close it looked to the ship in 2019 when I sailed into New York Harbor for my first time on board qm2

so now we know why qm 2's funnel is smaller than q2's and that it was shortened due to the clearance needed to pass under the verizo Nars bridge

the scoup was enlarged making it extremely effective at pushing air up and over the shorter funnel thus keeping the beautiful AF Terrace de clean for swimmers sunbathers and onlookers

Creator's Tips & Advice

Consider the air draft limits when designing ship funnels for specific ports
Ensure wind scoops are appropriately sized for shorter funnels to maintain deck cleanliness

Questions This Creator Answers

QWhy is Queen Mary 2's funnel shorter than QE2's?
QWhat design changes were made to the funnel of Queen Mary 2?

Topics Covered

Ship Condition3 Happy BaconPort Destination2 Happy Bacon

Port Highlights

Hong Kong
New York2 Happy Bacon
San Francisco
How to read the Trip Bacon Score
Happy Bacon — creators loved this aspect
Sad Bacon — creators took issue with this
Meh — no strong opinion either way

Scale: 0–5 strips in half-step increments. 0 = “meh”, 5 = “bacon bliss”. Aggregated from creator-review sentiment, weighted by channel expertise.

About our Bacon Score methodology
YouTube Video Description

When Cunard announced their plans to build Queen Mary 2, the first renditions of the ship showed a vessel with a large Cunard funnel of similar design to that found aboard the older QE2. But fast forward to today and it’s pretty easy to see that QM2’s funnel is much shorter than QE2’s, and much shorter than the original renditions of the ship. So let’s investigate why this is. — 🚢 My Cunard History Website: https://www.chriscunard.com/ 📚 Buy my books: https://www.chrisframe.com.au/books 👕 Buy cruise merch: https://chrisframeofficial.Teemill.com/ 🎶 Listen to The Big Cruise Podcast: https://thebigcruisepodcast.com/ 🛳️ Learn more about cruising at my Blog: https://www.chrisframe.com.au/ — Chapters: 00:00 QM2’s concept art funnel 00:26 Chris Frame Intro 00:49 QE2 funnel design 02:00 QM2 design origins 02:37 World’s Largest Liner 03:17 New York Harbor 03:55 Design Changes 5:18 Conclusion — The QM2’s predecessor, QE2, introduced a funnel that was the first among the Cunard fleet to incorporate the distinctive design we know and love today – with the black smoke stack, the red cowling and the white scoop – designed to direct air up and over the structure and push the smoke and soot away from the aft decks. In 1987 the design was supersized on QE2 to make it thick enough to accommodate an array of exhaust and heat exchangers for 9 brand new diesel engines. It was bold, and powerful looking and made QE2 even more recognisable. So it’s no surprise that when Carnival announced their plans to build the first true ocean liner in a generation, a big, tall, thick QE2 style funnel was included in the artists renditions. In fact, QM2’s designer Stephen Payne noted in a 2020 interview with me that he took inspiration from QE2 for a number of design elements – including the funnel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2uinSNslXo QM2 was the first ocean liner designed in a generation. As such, passenger expectations had changed. QM2 needed to be a larger ship to accommodate an extensive selection of balcony cabins. The ship is powered by both diesel engines – and gas turbines, the latter of which were positioned atop the vessel, adding extra height to her funnel-casing area. What resulted is the largest ocean liner yet built. But despite her size, QM2’s purpose was to replace QE2 on the transatlantic run between England and America. At the entry to New York Harbour sits the Verrazzano Narrows Bridge. All traffic entering the harbour needs to pass under this critical roadway. At high tide, the bridge has a clearance of 69m or 228 feet, and this posed a problem for QM2, as designers had to contend with a air-draught limit of 62m or 203ft from the waterline to the highest point on the ship. When those original renderings were drawn, the extra height for the gas turbine casing had yet to be included in the design, but with a like-for-like QE2 style funnel, the much taller QM2 would be unable to pass under the bridge, and this would make her primary purpose redundant. So designers shortened the funnel to allow QM2 a clearance of 3m or 9.8 ft at high water in the mid point of the arch of the bridge! A huge thank you to Stephen Payne for providing some insight into this for the creation of this video. -- Image thanks: Peter Knego: @midshipcinema Gavin Harper Epic Aug 2023 Thumbnail: Andrew Sassoli-Walker https://solentphotographer.com/ Luke Morrison: @Boeing_Luke Henry Farnam and Perry Poussard @luxevagabonds Image References: QE2 Funnel in Bremerhaven: Dashers, CC BY SA 3.0 - https://tinyurl.com/qm2-01 Verrezzano Bridge: Gian Castillo, CC BY SA 2.0 - https://tinyurl.com/qm2-0023 QM2 Renderings: Cunard Line (2003) - https://www.cunardline.com/ Tags: #QM2 #queenmary2 #cunard #cruisenews #oceanliner